Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41277534›Full record

ArticleJournal of health and social behavior2025

Seeing Discrimination: How Different Definitions of Discrimination Relate to Health in U.S. Adults.

Lauren Valentino, Evangeline Warren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health and social behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lauren ValentinoUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0252-054X
Evangeline WarrenThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3154-6068

Funding

Institute for Population ResearchP2CHD058484 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYFORD, SARAH R · 2014 to 2023
$5.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD058484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research demonstrates that perceived discrimination negatively impacts health. Yet there is conflicting evidence about how an individual's definition of discrimination-separate from their experience of discrimination-shapes health disparities. Using a nationally representative survey experiment in which participants (N = 2,000) are asked to evaluate nine different scenarios of potential discrimination, we find that how a person labels these discrimination scenarios is significantly related to their self-rated health, even after controlling for sociodemographic factors. U.S. adults who are more likely to label the event as discrimination in cases where it is intentional have comparatively worse self-rated health, whereas those who are more likely to label discrimination in cases where it affects more powerful groups (White people, men, and the wealthy) have comparatively better self-rated health-even though they are not experiencing the discrimination themselves. We argue that these findings have important implications for how health researchers measure discrimination's health effects.

Indexed as

appraisaldiscriminationracismself-rated healthsexism

Identifiers

PMID41277534
PMCPMC12821785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.