Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41277441›Full record

ArticlemAbs2025

AbAgym: a well-curated dataset for the mutational analysis of antibody-antigen complexes.

Gabriel Cia, Dong Li, Simón Poblete, Marianne Rooman, Fabrizio Pucci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gabriel CiaComputational Biology and Bioinformatics, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Dong LiComputational Biology and Bioinformatics, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Simón PobleteFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile.
Marianne RoomanComputational Biology and Bioinformatics, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Fabrizio PucciComputational Biology and Bioinformatics, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2916-022X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With monoclonal antibodies becoming one of the largest classes of biopharmaceuticals, it is important to have curated data to train computational models that can accelerate their design. Despite the massive amount of mutagenesis data generated on antibody-antigen interactions, only a few small, well-curated datasets are available. This paper introduces AbAgym, a manually curated repository comprising approximately 324k mutations in antibody-antigen complexes, including approximately 10% of interface mutations, whose effects on antibody-antigen binding have been experimentally quantified through deep mutational scanning (DMS) experiments. We collected and curated 68 DMS datasets from the literature together with the three-dimensional structure of each antibody-antigen complex. We benchmarked the performance of established force field methods as well as recent machine learning models that predict the change in binding affinity upon mutation. The former achieved modest performance, whereas the latter performed only marginally better than random. Finally, our analysis of hotspot residues responsible for immune evasion highlights the importance of accounting for biological complexities, such as conformational changes or oligomeric states that influence antibody-antigen binding, which are often overlooked. Abagym is freely available for academic use at https://github.com/3BioCompBio/Abagym.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntigen-Antibody ComplexMutationDatabases, ProteinHumansMachine LearningAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigen-Antibody ComplexAntibody–antigen complexmutations

Identifiers

PMID41277441
PMCPMC12645894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.