ArticlemAbs2025
AbAgym: a well-curated dataset for the mutational analysis of antibody-antigen complexes.
Article in mAbs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ASD: antigen-specific antibody database.mAbs · 2026Article
- Fitness Landscape for Antibodies 2: Benchmarking Reveals That Protein AI Models Cannot Yet Consistently Predict Developability Properties.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With monoclonal antibodies becoming one of the largest classes of biopharmaceuticals, it is important to have curated data to train computational models that can accelerate their design. Despite the massive amount of mutagenesis data generated on antibody-antigen interactions, only a few small, well-curated datasets are available. This paper introduces AbAgym, a manually curated repository comprising approximately 324k mutations in antibody-antigen complexes, including approximately 10% of interface mutations, whose effects on antibody-antigen binding have been experimentally quantified through deep mutational scanning (DMS) experiments. We collected and curated 68 DMS datasets from the literature together with the three-dimensional structure of each antibody-antigen complex. We benchmarked the performance of established force field methods as well as recent machine learning models that predict the change in binding affinity upon mutation. The former achieved modest performance, whereas the latter performed only marginally better than random. Finally, our analysis of hotspot residues responsible for immune evasion highlights the importance of accounting for biological complexities, such as conformational changes or oligomeric states that influence antibody-antigen binding, which are often overlooked. Abagym is freely available for academic use at https://github.com/3BioCompBio/Abagym.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.