ArticleThoracic cancer2025
Comparison of Subxiphoid and Lateral Intercostal Thoracoscopic Surgery for Anterior Mediastinal Tumors: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection: a propensity score-matched analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of subxiphoid and lateral intercostal approaches for video-assisted thoracoscopic extended thymectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of Subxiphoid and Lateral Intercostal Thoracoscopic Surgery for Anterior Mediastinal Tumors: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes of subxiphoid approach thoracoscopic surgery (SATS) versus lateral intercostal approach thoracoscopic surgery (LIATS) for anterior mediastinal tumors.
methodsClinical data from patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for anterior mediastinal tumors between April 1, 2020 and December 31, 2023 were analyzed. Patients were stratified into two cohorts according to the surgical approach used: the SATS group (n = 679) and the LIATS group (n = 461). Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.
resultsA total of 1140 patients were included in the statistical analysis after screening and assessment. After propensity score matching, a total of 417 SATS patients were matched with 417 LIATS patients. In the analysis of the outcomes, the LIATS group had a shorter operation time than the SATS group (p < 0.001). There were no statistical differences in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores on Postoperative Day 1 (p = 0.113), Day 2 (p = 0.189), or Day 3 (p = 0.462). Postoperative atelectasis was more common in the SATS group than in the LIATS group (p = 0.025). There were no perioperative deaths.
conclusionsThe SATS did not demonstrate significant improvements in postoperative pain compared with the LIATS. However, the LIATS was associated with shorter operative time in the overall cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.