Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41277293›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026

Defining Critical Emergency Medicine (CrEM): A Delphi Study From Scandinavia.

Denise Bäckström, Miretta Tommila, Mette Pedersen, Thomas Lindner, Nanna Kruse, Robert Larsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Denise BäckströmDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4075-4600
Miretta TommilaDivision of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Mette PedersenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hospital of Lillebaelt, Kolding, Denmark.
Thomas LindnerRAKOS, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Nanna KruseDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0000-3838-2284
Robert LarsenDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical emergency medicine (CrEM) is one of four subspecialty pillars within anesthesiology and intensive care medicine, as defined by the Scandinavian Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI). Despite its recognized clinical relevance, a comprehensive definition of CrEM has until now been lacking. The aim of this study was to establish a consensus-based definition of CrEM and delineate its core components, competencies, and operational domains.

methodsA modified Delphi study was conducted among experts from the SSAI-CrEM education program. The process involved two iterative rounds followed by external validation with alumni from previous CrEM programs. Statements for evaluation were generated from participant essays and refined by a steering committee of experienced consultants. Consensus was defined as ≥ 90% agreement.

resultsOf 44 initial statements, 37 reached consensus and were organized into six thematic domains: (1) Core Function and Scope, (2) Competence and Training, (3) Work Environment and Challenges, (4) Interdisciplinary and Teamwork Approach, (5) Ethical and Decision-Making Responsibilities, and (6) Need for Research and Continuous Development. CrEM was defined as a physician-led, context-adapted subspecialty focusing on rapid stabilization, life-saving interventions, and high-acuity care across diverse clinical, and prehospital environments. The results emphasize the need for structured training, ethical competence, leadership in multidisciplinary teams, and ongoing scientific development.

conclusionCrEM constitutes a distinct and essential subspecialty within anesthesiology and intensive care medicine, bridging advanced emergency care across institutional boundaries. This study provides a structured definition and framework that may support curriculum development, clinical governance, and research initiatives within the field. Future work should aim to further validate these findings and guide the evolution of CrEM in both clinical and academic contexts. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This Delphi process report presents the practice and training concepts for critical emergency medicine as a subspecialty of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine in the Nordic country medical context. Perhaps particular for the Nordic countries, which combine medical specialty expertise and practice areas for perioperative medicine, intensive care medicine, pain medicine, and emergency (critical) prehospital care, this document describes current goals in susbpecialty education for the Nordic practice tradition for critical emergency medicine.

Indexed as

Critical CareEmergency MedicineAnesthesiologyClinical CompetenceConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansScandinavian and Nordic Countries

Identifiers

PMID41277293
PMCPMC12641238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.