Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41277292›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025

An exploratory study of explainable deep learning for predicting bone mineral density using clavicle features on chest radiographs: A multi-task approach with regression and segmentation.

Yoshiyuki Iwao, Kenshi Shiotsuki, Fumio Hashimoto, Takahiro Ochiai, Tsuneo Kagawa, Ryoichi Nagata, Michihiro Eto, Yuji Hatanaka, Yukito Yoshida, Yoshiki Asayama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yoshiyuki IwaoMedical Technology Department, Oita University Hospital, Yufu City, Oita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8713-1845
Kenshi ShiotsukiMedical Technology Department, Oita University Hospital, Yufu City, Oita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0337-2005
Fumio HashimotoGraduate School of Science and Engineering, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2352-0538
Takahiro OchiaiMedical Technology Department, Oita University Hospital, Yufu City, Oita, Japan.
Tsuneo KagawaDivision of Computer Science and Intelligent Systems, Faculty of Science and Technology, Oita University, Oita City, Oita, Japan.
Ryoichi NagataDivision of Computer Science and Intelligent Systems, Faculty of Science and Technology, Oita University, Oita City, Oita, Japan.
Michihiro EtoDepartment of Health and Medical Sciences, Nippon Bunri University, Oita City, Oita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2159-2015
Yuji HatanakaDivision of Computer Science and Intelligent Systems, Faculty of Science and Technology, Oita University, Oita City, Oita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8621-5592
Yukito YoshidaMedical Technology Department, Oita University Hospital, Yufu City, Oita, Japan.
Yoshiki AsayamaDepartment of Radiology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu City, Oita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6495-4821

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough bone mineral density (BMD) measurement using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most common method of diagnosing osteoporosis, it is not widely used to screen patients. In this exploratory study, we developed a multi-task learning model that predicts BMD from chest radiographs using clavicular features and supports network explainability.

methodsThe proposed multi-task learning model integrates segmentation and regression tasks by incorporating a regression branch into the U-Net architecture in an end-to-end manner. A total of 1600 patients who underwent chest radiography and DXA of the lumbar vertebrae were included in this study. We compared the BMD predictive performance of the mean absolute error (MAE) and Pearson correlation coefficient (R value) between the proposed multi-task learning model and the single-task learning model, which was defined as the comparison model that only performed BMD prediction. Additionally, model performance for classifying osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal bone status was evaluated via reclassification analysis based on the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Confusion matrices were generated, and classwise and macro-averaged performance metrics were calculated. To confirm the rationale for the BMD predictions, we evaluated heat maps generated using the gradient-weighted class activation mapping technique to determine whether the highlighted regions overlapped with the clavicle.

resultsThe multi-task learning model demonstrated superior predictive performance (MAE of 0.092 g/cm

conclusionThe proposed multi-task learning model demonstrated the predictive rationale by focusing on the clavicle in chest radiographs, which is clinically relevant to BMD, and showed improved performance compared with the single-task model.

Indexed as

Bone DensityClavicleDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOsteoporosisRadiography, ThoracicAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedconvolutional neural networkdeep learningexplainable artificial intelligencemulti‐task learning

Identifiers

PMID41277292
PMCPMC12641102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.