ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
An exploratory study of explainable deep learning for predicting bone mineral density using clavicle features on chest radiographs: A multi-task approach with regression and segmentation.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Risk Prediction and Therapy: Current Advances, Clinical Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Review
- An exploratory study of explainable deep learning for predicting bone mineral density using clavicle features on chest radiographs: A multi-task approach with regression and segmentation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAlthough bone mineral density (BMD) measurement using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most common method of diagnosing osteoporosis, it is not widely used to screen patients. In this exploratory study, we developed a multi-task learning model that predicts BMD from chest radiographs using clavicular features and supports network explainability.
methodsThe proposed multi-task learning model integrates segmentation and regression tasks by incorporating a regression branch into the U-Net architecture in an end-to-end manner. A total of 1600 patients who underwent chest radiography and DXA of the lumbar vertebrae were included in this study. We compared the BMD predictive performance of the mean absolute error (MAE) and Pearson correlation coefficient (R value) between the proposed multi-task learning model and the single-task learning model, which was defined as the comparison model that only performed BMD prediction. Additionally, model performance for classifying osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal bone status was evaluated via reclassification analysis based on the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Confusion matrices were generated, and classwise and macro-averaged performance metrics were calculated. To confirm the rationale for the BMD predictions, we evaluated heat maps generated using the gradient-weighted class activation mapping technique to determine whether the highlighted regions overlapped with the clavicle.
resultsThe multi-task learning model demonstrated superior predictive performance (MAE of 0.092 g/cm
conclusionThe proposed multi-task learning model demonstrated the predictive rationale by focusing on the clavicle in chest radiographs, which is clinically relevant to BMD, and showed improved performance compared with the single-task model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.