ArticleBJS open2025
Quality indicators for breast reconstruction following cancer-an international Delphi consensus study supported by the European Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery.
Article in BJS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality indicators (QIs) are essential for assessing and improving healthcare delivery. Existing QIs for breast reconstruction are limited and do not comprehensively reflect clinical complexity or patient-centred outcomes. This study aimed to develop a scientifically grounded, consensus-based set of QIs for breast reconstruction using the Delphi method.
methodsA structured Delphi process was conducted. Experts, including plastic surgeons, reconstructive nurses, and patient representatives from 21 European countries, were nominated by national professional and patient organizations. A pre-round generated 141 unique QIs, thematically analysed and categorized into six domains. Three Delphi rounds were conducted via electronic surveys. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥ 75% agreement across the whole group or at least two subgroups. Indicators were classified according to Donabedian's model (structure, process, outcome).
resultsAmong the 43 experts completing all rounds, 41 QIs reached final consensus. These indicators span six key quality domains (Safety, Timeliness, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Equity, and Patient-centredness) and include measures such as access to reconstruction, treatment timelines, multidisciplinary collaboration, unit characteristics, surgical outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Structure, process, and outcome indicators were all represented, including patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported experiences.
conclusionThis Delphi study provides the first comprehensive set of QIs specific to breast reconstruction in Europe. These indicators lay the groundwork for future standardization, benchmarking, and quality improvement initiatives. Further work is needed to operationalize the indicators through evidence grading, measurement specifications, risk adjustment, and integration into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.