Trial reportBJS open2025
Combined transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath blocks with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia versus epidural analgesia for kidney transplantation: randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial.
Trial report in BJS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regional Anaesthesia Techniques in Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Narrative Review in Donors and Recipients.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEpidural analgesia can improve early postoperative recovery after renal transplantation. Abdominal wall blocks (transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath (RS)) combined with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) have also been shown to enhance postoperative recovery. However, it remains unclear whether these techniques are as effective as epidural analgesia (EP).
methodsIn this single-centre randomized non-inferiority clinical trial, participants undergoing renal transplantation were randomly assigned to receive either a TAP + RS block (combined with PCIA) or EP alone. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores on postoperative day (POD) 1. Secondary outcomes included haemodynamics, indices of postoperative renal function, time to interventions, and postoperative pain scores.
resultsNinety participants were included in the analysis. The TAP + RS group demonstrated non-inferiority to the EP group in terms of the mean(standard deviation) total QoR-15 score on POD1 (90.6(5.0) versus 92.4(6.4); mean difference, -1.8; 95% confidence interval -4.2 to 0.6; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). QoR-15 scores on POD3 and POD7 and indices of postoperative renal function were comparable between the two groups, with no group-time interactions. The EP group had significantly lower mean arterial pressure and intraoperative opioid consumption, as well as shorter times to eye opening and extubation, than the TAP + RS group. However, the intervention time was longer in the EP group (P < 0.001).
conclusionTAP + RS block combined with PCIA demonstrated non-inferiority to EP for postoperative QoR-15 scores after kidney transplantation. TAP + RS block offers a potentially more convenient and favourable alternative to EP, helping maintain haemodynamic stability, postoperative renal function, and a low complication profile. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2200056455 (https://www.chictr.org.cn).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.