ArticlePalliative medicine2026
Shifting to online and telephone bereavement support provision during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study of bereavement service provider perspectives and lessons learnt for current practice.
Article in Palliative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Support needs, support use and perceived helpfulness of support in a cohort of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a longitudinal survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- 'I'm tired of justifying why my life has stopped': A qualitative analysis of the experiences and support needs of young people caring at the end of life and into bereavement.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProvision of remote (online/telephone) bereavement support accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the extent and impact of this change and lessons learnt are unknown.
aimTo determine the extent to which UK voluntary and community sector bereavement services moved to remote support provision during the pandemic, explore providers' perspectives on this shift, and consider implications.
designMixed methods explanatory sequential study, conducted spring 2021: (1) Online survey of UK bereavement services; (2) Qualitative interviews with staff and volunteers. SETTING/
participants147 services participated in the survey; 44.5% hospice/palliative care services; 15.1% national charities/organisations; 11.6% local charities/ organisations. 24 interviews were conducted across 14 services.
resultsPre-pandemic, remote support was offered by <10% of bereavement organisations. By spring 2021, there had been increases in online: peer group meetings (3.4% pre-pandemic to 33% during, OR 13.8), facilitated group meetings (4.1%-56%, OR 30.48), 1:1 support (8.8%-83%, OR 50.3), and specialist intervention (3.4%-36%, OR 16.01). Telephone bereavement support was also more widely available. The appropriateness and acceptability of these changes differed by client group. Adaptations presented organisational/logistical challenges, and difficulties for support providers working from home. Smaller organisations with fewer resources found these harder to accommodate. Hybrid working and new technologies were reported to increase service efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
conclusionsRemote delivery of bereavement support increased support capacity and can potentially reduce inequities in access. However, it needs to be carefully tailored, and is not appropriate for everyone. Staff and volunteers providing remote services require training and support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.