ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2025
Cytotoxic effect of 3D-printed and thermoformed clear aligner materials on human oral fibroblasts: An
Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hygroscopic behaviour and colour stability of 3D-printed and thermoformed aligner materials: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Review
- Biocompatibility of Direct 3D-Printed Clear Aligner Resins: A Comparative In Vitro Cytotoxicity Analysis.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the cytotoxicity of three dimensional (3D)-printed resins and conventional materials used for orthodontic aligner production. Methods: 3D-printed materials such as 3Dresyn OD-Clear, Clear A, and Tera Harz TC-85 were compared with one thermoplastic material-Duran+. The samples were stored in artificial saliva at 37°C for 7 and 14 days to simulate the oral conditions during one phase of aligner therapy. The saliva was subsequently diluted with cell culture medium to concentrations of 10% (c1), 20% (c2), and 30% (c3). The cytotoxicity of the materials was assessed in human oral fibroblasts using the CCK-8 assay after incubation periods of 4 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours. Results: Cytotoxic effects were observed for Clear A (62.9% cell viability at c3; 7 days in saliva; 72-hour incubation) and Tera Harz (69.2% cell viability at c3; 14 days in saliva; 72-hour incubation). Significant differences under certain conditions were found between the following material pairs: Clear A and Tera Harz, Clear A and Duran+, 3Dresyn and Clear A, and 3Dresyn and Duran+ ( Conclusions: Among the tested materials, 3Dresyn OD-Clear and Duran+ demonstrated consistently good biocompatibility, highlighting their potential for safe clinical use. Although the other materials were generally biocompatible, they exhibited cytotoxic effects under certain conditions, underscoring the need for thorough testing to ensure safe clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.