Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41277149›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2025

Cytotoxic effect of 3D-printed and thermoformed clear aligner materials on human oral fibroblasts: An

Ružica Bandić, Ivna Vuković Kekez, Katarina Vodanović Stranput, Nensi Bralić, Vedrana Čikeš Čulić, Ivana Medvedec Mikić, Ivan Galić, Gordana Paić Karega, Danijela Kalibović Govorko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ružica BandićDepartment of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0811-6983
Ivna Vuković KekezDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9616-420X
Katarina Vodanović StranputPrivate Practice, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6985-5849
Nensi BralićDepartment of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9509-0210
Vedrana Čikeš ČulićDepartment of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4415-4410
Ivana Medvedec MikićDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0202-3399
Ivan GalićDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0387-9535
Gordana Paić KaregaDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3439-0519
Danijela Kalibović GovorkoDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2598-9009

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the cytotoxicity of three dimensional (3D)-printed resins and conventional materials used for orthodontic aligner production. Methods: 3D-printed materials such as 3Dresyn OD-Clear, Clear A, and Tera Harz TC-85 were compared with one thermoplastic material-Duran+. The samples were stored in artificial saliva at 37°C for 7 and 14 days to simulate the oral conditions during one phase of aligner therapy. The saliva was subsequently diluted with cell culture medium to concentrations of 10% (c1), 20% (c2), and 30% (c3). The cytotoxicity of the materials was assessed in human oral fibroblasts using the CCK-8 assay after incubation periods of 4 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours. Results: Cytotoxic effects were observed for Clear A (62.9% cell viability at c3; 7 days in saliva; 72-hour incubation) and Tera Harz (69.2% cell viability at c3; 14 days in saliva; 72-hour incubation). Significant differences under certain conditions were found between the following material pairs: Clear A and Tera Harz, Clear A and Duran+, 3Dresyn and Clear A, and 3Dresyn and Duran+ ( Conclusions: Among the tested materials, 3Dresyn OD-Clear and Duran+ demonstrated consistently good biocompatibility, highlighting their potential for safe clinical use. Although the other materials were generally biocompatible, they exhibited cytotoxic effects under certain conditions, underscoring the need for thorough testing to ensure safe clinical use.

Indexed as

3D printingBiocompatibilityCell culture techniquesOrthodontic appliances

Identifiers

PMID41277149
PMCPMC12644642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.