ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2026
Point-of-Care CagA Antibody Positivity and Its Association with Precancerous Gastric Changes.
Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection efforts in gastric carcinoma focus on identifying those with gastric premalignant conditions (GPMC), as they may benefit from secondary prevention. Noninvasive identification of persons with GPMC is an ideal avenue, but currently, no such strategy exists. Although persons with cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA; the most well-known virulence factor in Helicobacter pylori infection) may be more prone to GPMC, CagA has traditionally been limited to research settings. Recently, a novel point-of-care (POC) test for CagA was developed. In this study, we report on the clinical utility of this test. We evaluated samples from adults undergoing preplanned endoscopy between 2023 and 2025 for benign indications to evaluate the association between GPMC and CagA antibody positivity. Among 95 persons, we found that 40% had H. pylori infection, 14% had GPMC, and 41% had CagA antibody positivity. There was a nonsignificant association between CagA antibody positivity and GPMC [odds ratio (OR) = 1.68; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.48-5.85; P = 0.42]. In those without active H. pylori, the OR for CagA antibody positivity was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.13 to 4.73; P = 0.79), whereas in those with H. pylori, the OR for CagA antibody positivity was 3.46 (95% CI, 0.29 to 41.52; P = 0.33). We found nonsignificant associations between CagA antibody positivity and GPMC and active H. pylori infection may represent an important effect modifier. Our data suggest that although larger-scale validation is needed, a risk-guided screening strategy could include first testing for active H. pylori infection (e.g., breath or stool test), and if positive, POC testing for CagA antibodies. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Early detection of gastric cancer is sorely needed, and a risk-stratified approach to detecting which persons are likely to have gastric premalignant lesions and may benefit from endoscopy is the optimal secondary surveillance strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.