Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41277075›Full record

ArticleMedical education2026

Locum doctor working: A qualitative exploration of the implications for learning and professional development.

Jane Ferguson, Gemma Stringer, Kieran Walshe, Thomas Allen, Christos Grigoroglou, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Darren M Ashcroft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jane FergusonHealth Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8129-8376
Gemma StringerAlliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9325-3362
Kieran WalsheAlliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0696-480X
Thomas AllenManchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2972-7911
Christos GrigoroglouManchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1621-8648
Evangelos KontopantelisNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6450-5815
Darren M AshcroftDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK g NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2958-915X

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Service and Delivery Research programme NIHR128349NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the English National Health Service, and other health care systems internationally, there have been growing numbers of doctors working on a short- or long-term temporary basis as 'locums'. Social environments and professional relationships are fundamental to learning in clinical contexts; however, locums are often positioned at the periphery of the organisation and the clinical team. An examination of locum learning and continuing professional development is vital to understanding the implications of temporary working for the growing numbers of mobile doctors, often working at the margins of the medical workforce, and whose career trajectories may diverge from traditional models.

methodsQualitative interview and focus group data were collected from 130 participants, including 88 professionals and 42 patients, between March 2021 and April 2022 in primary and secondary health care organisations in the English NHS. Participants included locums, patients, permanently employed doctors, nurses and other health care professionals with governance and recruitment responsibilities for locums. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and abductive analysis.

resultsFour themes were developed from the data: (1) exclusion from formal and informal learning opportunities; (2) self-directed learning and workarounds; (3) decline in knowledge and clinical skills; (4) effects on the professional development of the wider team. Locums were frequently excluded from feedback and learning opportunities because they were considered expensive and not the responsibility of the organisation and there to work, not to train. This meant that professional development was often the responsibility of the locum, self-directed and divorced from context. Locums often did not take on educational supervision roles for the wider team, meaning wider learning and development were disrupted or paused.

conclusionTo address the challenges locum working might bring for learning and professional development, professional bodies should provide guidance for locum doctors highlighting the risks associated with taking on locum work before medical knowledge and experience are established. To improve quality and safety, organisational leaders should include locums in developmental opportunities. Finally, policy makers need to strike a balance between using locums to address short-term workforce quotas and the long-term impact on the knowledge and development of the workforce and patient safety.

Indexed as

LearningPhysiciansStaff DevelopmentAdultClinical CompetenceFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID41277075
PMCPMC13067080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.