ArticleEpidemiology and infection2025
Waning in influenza vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09-associated hospitalization in children in 2012/2013.
Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Measuring waning in vaccine effectiveness (VE) is challenging due to potential depletion-of-susceptibles bias. Some SARS-CoV-2 studies excluded individuals with prior infection and adjusted for the probability of remaining uninfected. We applied this approach to assess waning influenza VE in Hong Kong during the 2012/2013 season. First, we estimated the infection risk for unvaccinated children using published serological and surveillance data. Next, we derived infection risk for vaccinated children, assuming VE against infection of 57%. Uncorrected VE from 14 to 270 days post-vaccination was estimated from hospitalized children. We calculated the rate of depletion of susceptibles given infection risk and VE corrected for depletion-of-susceptibles bias. Waning rates for uncorrected and bias-corrected VE were measured by comparing VE at day 270 versus day 14. Bias was assessed as the absolute difference between two waning rates in percentage points. Waning rate of uncorrected VE was overestimated by 5.9 percentage points or 1.3 percentage points when assessed up to day 120. Bias was substantial when assuming 80% unvaccinated, and all vaccinated children were initially uninfected, but minimal when these proportions were similar. The observed waning in 2012/2013 was unlikely due to depletion-of-susceptibles bias. Further studies across various conditions are needed to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.