ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025
Objective Measures of Physical Functioning, Disabilities in Daily Life and Trends During Ageing: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between muscle-specific strength and disability in instrumental activities of daily living in patients with chronic kidney disease.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of the AITIS model for test-free identification of sarcopenia in patients with stage IV-V non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Objective Measures of Physical Functioning, Disabilities in Daily Life and Trends During Ageing: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMaintenance of adequate physical functioning is key for lifelong health, particularly for an ageing society with increasing health care needs. We aimed to assess the association of two objective physical function (PF) measures with functional capacity (FC) outcomes, while also exploring the underlying trends.
methodsThis was a repeated cross-sectional study. We used data from a nationally representative survey of middle-aged and older Chinese individuals across 150 counties or districts across 28 provinces of China. Longitudinal data from three waves collected in 2011 (baseline, n = 4753), 2013 (n = 4922) and 2015 (n = 6165) were used for parallel analysis. PF was measured using the five-time chair stand test (CST) and gait speed (GS). FC outcomes were assessed using 20 items related to activities of daily living or instrumental activities of daily living. We conducted various analyses, including dose-dependent analyses, cutoff development, multivariate analyses and causal inference, to systematically examine the associations across multiple dimensions.
resultsA total of 15 840 participants from three waves were analysed. FC limitations increased as the study population aged. The most frequently reported limitation across all three waves was the inability to jog 1 km (59.2%, 60.3% and 60.7%, respectively). Compared to low GS, prolonged CST time was more strongly associated with a greater number of FC limitation items (2011, 20 vs. 16; 2013, 20 vs. 16; 2015, 20 vs. 20). The associations between both PF measures and outcomes were predominantly nonlinear and dose-dependent (all p < 0.05). Overall, CST showed superior performance relative to GS for diagnosing different FC limitations. The optimal global cutoffs were 0.66 m/s for GS and 10.85 s for CST. Controlling for age, sex and BMI, we noted that CST had generally higher standardized odds ratios than GS in predicting FC outcomes. Causal inference analysis revealed that CST had a stronger direct causal effect on overall FC than GS, both at the global and local levels in all three waves (for instance, average treatment effect in the baseline survey, CST = 0.729, 95% CI = 0.470-0.989, GS = 0.235, 95% CI = 0.033-0.438).
conclusionsPF measures have varied performance to reflect the diversity and magnitude of activities individuals actually perform. CST has stronger associations with multidimensional FC than GS despite the ageing process. This superiority also exists in those activities that do not primarily involve the lower limb musculoskeletal system. These findings are crucial for health stakeholders to develop more targeted strategies for managing functional limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.