Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276826›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025

Learning to connect: feasibility, acceptability and experiences in the social domain intervention for eating disorders.

Ava Ryan, Sharon Arthur, Linh Lieu, Rohini Kallianpur, Fariah Mahmood, Natalie Noebel, Melanie Sherman-Chung, Carrie J McAdams

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06198023 (Targeting Social Function to Improve Outcomes in Anxiety and Eating Disorders), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06198023 narecruitingnot on this map

Targeting Social Function to Improve Outcomes in Anxiety and Eating Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRan2024 to 2028Enrolled60ConditionsEating Disorders, Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa, Atypical Anorexia NervosaArmsEducational, Interactive
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ava RyanThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1440 Empire Central Dr, Dallas, TX 75247, USA.
Sharon ArthurThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1440 Empire Central Dr, Dallas, TX 75247, USA.
Linh LieuThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1440 Empire Central Dr, Dallas, TX 75247, USA.
Rohini KallianpurThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1440 Empire Central Dr, Dallas, TX 75247, USA.
Fariah MahmoodThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1440 Empire Central Dr, Dallas, TX 75247, USA.
Natalie NoebelThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1440 Empire Central Dr, Dallas, TX 75247, USA.
Melanie Sherman-ChungThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1440 Empire Central Dr, Dallas, TX 75247, USA.
Carrie J McAdamsThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1440 Empire Central Dr, Dallas, TX 75247, USA. carrie.mcadams@utsouthwestern.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEating disorders have been associated with neurobehavioral differences in social processing and interactions. Clinically, social support is a positive prognostic factor that protects against relapse. For these reasons, interventions that modify features in the social domain may be promising therapeutic targets to improve outcomes in eating disorders. Because groups require multiple social interactions, group therapy may be an ideal format to facilitate change. However, there is currently no standard adjunctive therapy for eating disorders that targets social domain concepts in a group setting.

methodThe Social Domain Intervention (SDI) is an eight-session intervention that focuses on building insight about social processing within a group. Each session includes a collaborative experiential art task followed by a psychoeducational presentation and related activity. Engagement in the SDI was measured in terms of sessions attended and assignments completed. Written participant feedback was analyzed using Braun and Clark's method for thematic analysis. Written responses were coded and then grouped into themes.

resultsEighteen female participants between the ages of 18-30 were enrolled in the group across three cohorts. Two participants withdrew after attending three sessions. On average, the remaining 16 participants attended 7 out of 8 group sessions and completed 5 out of 7 homework assignments. Qualitative analysis of feedback revealed that participants valued both the artistic component and the psychoeducation. The most highly rated sessions discussed identity, values, and connection. The main themes identified were that self-disclosure facilitates closeness, perfectionism impedes connection, shared accomplishments enhance satisfaction, and that art is a valuable grounding tool for emotional regulation. The primary challenges described by participants were related to perfectionism, social anxiety, and feelings of vulnerability. DISCUSSION: Collaborative art therapy may be an effective modality for patients struggling with distress tolerance or avoidant behaviors, as the tasks necessitate engagement in the present moment. The concurrent psychoeducation allows participants to openly discuss the challenges, goals, and expectations present in their social interactions. Time-limited groups may be successful adjunctive treatments for outpatients with eating disorders. More work is needed to determine if these groups can facilitate long-term changes in interpersonal relationships.

trial registrationNCT06198023.

Indexed as

AnorexiaBulimiaEating disordersSocial anxietySocial phobia

Identifiers

PMID41276826
PMCPMC12752273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.