Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276816›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

Fu's subcutaneous needling-assisted conservative treatment for distal radius fracture healing: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Cheng Chen, Yusha Yang, Hai Huang, Wenqi Guo, Shuxu Wu, Jian Sun

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cheng Chen *Clinical Medical College of Acupuncture & Moxibustion and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yusha Yang *Clinical Medical College of Acupuncture & Moxibustion and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Hai HuangClinical Medical College of Acupuncture & Moxibustion and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Wenqi GuoThe Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shuxu WuThe Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. wushuxu2006@163.com.
Jian SunClinical Medical College of Acupuncture & Moxibustion and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. sunj3610@163.com.

Funding

The First-Class Discipline Capacity Enhancement Project of the "Strengthening Foundation" Program, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine GZY2025GB0202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClosed reduction is often used to treat distal radius fractures (DRFs). After that, splint immobilization is used to keep the bone in the right position. But, long-term immobilization can cause problems like joint stiffness, long-lasting swelling, and slow bone healing. Rehabilitation training is a commonly employed recovery modality following conservative management of fractures. However, its efficacy is often suboptimal, primarily attributable to two key factors: nonstandardized rehabilitation protocol design and poor patient compliance with prescribed training regimens in terms of both adherence to schedule and completion of required exercise dosage. Earlier studies show that Fu's Subcutaneous Needling (FSN) therapy can lessen wrist pain and swelling, and also improve joint movement in patients with fractures of DRFs. But we need more evidence to prove it works. This trial wants to see if combining FSN therapy with rehabilitation training can help promote fracture healing and improve post-fracture symptoms in DRFs better and safer when added to conservative treatment, compared to using sham FSN therapy with rehab exercises. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-center, sham-controlled clinical trial will enroll 84 eligible patients, randomly allocated to two groups (n = 42). The intervention group will receive FSN therapy, while the control group will undergo sham FSN therapy. The treatment schedule includes three sessions in the first week post-reduction, two sessions per week in weeks 2-3, and one session per week in weeks 4-8, totaling 12 sessions. The primary outcome is the time to radiographic union, assessed using a modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures (RUST) adapted for distal radius fractures. Secondary outcomes include complications (e.g., pain, swelling), functional recovery (measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH] score), and radiographic parameters (e.g., volar tilt, radial height). DISCUSSION: This study is expected to validate the clinical value of FSN therapy as a safe and effective adjunctive approach for rehabilitation following DRFs, bridging the technical gap between conventional conservative treatment and functional recovery.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentDry NeedlingFracture HealingRadius FracturesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeWrist Fractures

Identifiers

PMID41276816
PMCPMC12802264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.