SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Effects of seven types of exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP): a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07428070 (Comparative Effectiveness of Contextually Enhanced Exercise Programs for Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Effectiveness of Contextually Enhanced Exercise Programs for Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP) is the most common cause of shoulder pain and represents one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions affecting the shoulder. Despite ample evidence supporting the effectiveness of exercise therapy for RCRSP, no consensus exists regarding the optimal exercise intervention. This systematic review aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of specific versus conventional exercise interventions for improving pain and dysfunction in patients with RCRSP.
methodsThe MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, SPORTiscus, and Web of Science databases were searched up to June 2025. Randomized controlled trials that diagnosed with RCRSP or a synonymous condition (e.g., rotator cuff tendinopathy, subacromial impingement, subacromial pain syndrome, subacromial bursitis, long-head biceps tendinopathy, or partial-thickness rotator cuff tear) were included, comparing at least two different types of exercise interventions and reporting on the effects associated with pain, dysfunction, related self-reported outcome metrics. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to compare seven exercise interventions, with treatments ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).
resultsThe Shoulder Pain Score Analysis Network contained 15 studies (n = 913; 45% female); the Shoulder Dysfunction Index Analysis Network contained 16 studies (n = 947; 47% female). In terms of shoulder dysfunction improvement, concentric strengthening training (CST) demonstrated a significant advantage in most comparisons and was identified as the most effective exercise intervention program for the treatment of RCRSP, eccentric strengthening training (ECT) and traditional training (TT) were moderately effective, and significantly superior to motor control exercise (MCE) and scapula-focused training (SFT). HLT, which had negative effect sizes in most comparisons, appeared to be the worst exercise intervention program. In terms of shoulder pain improvement, CST also has the highest probability of being ranked first, but comparisons between the other types of interventions were largely non-significant.
conclusionCST performed best in improving both shoulder pain and shoulder dysfunction. When patients with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain are not suitable for CST, ECT and MCE can be used as alternatives for the treatment of RCRSP.
trial registrationPROSPERO Registration No. CRD420251022110.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.