ArticlePsychiatry investigation2025
Optimizing Suicide Risk Prediction in Korea: A Comparison of Model Performance Using Resampling Methods and Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Educational Disparities in the Impact of Suicidal Ideation on Long-Term Cardio-Cerebrovascular Outcomes: A Prospective Cohort Study.Psychiatry investigation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMachine learning (ML) can assist in predicting suicide risk and identifying associated risk factors. Various resampling methods and algorithms must be applied to develop an ML prediction model with better performance. In this study, we developed an optimal Korean suicide prediction model by applying five ML algorithms, unsampled data, and two resampling methods.
methodsIn this study, data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for 2017, 2019, and 2021 were integrated and analyzed to predict suicidal ideation in subjects aged ≥19 years. Logistic regression, random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor, gradient boosting, and adaptive boosting were used as ML algorithms. Undersampling and oversampling are used as resampling methods to solve data imbalance problems.
resultsAmong the study participants, 16,947 (95.14%) and 866 (4.86%) belonged to the control and suicidal ideation groups, respectively. Among the 15 ML models, the RF model exhibited excellent performance (sensitivity=0.781, area under the curve=0.870) in an algorithm trained with undersampled data.
conclusionDeveloping an optimized Korean suicide prediction model through additional validation based on the ML model developed in this study will help predict suicide risk factors caused by the interaction of individual, social, and environmental factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.