ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Development of a Reproducible Framework and Pathway to Support Innovation in an Academic Surgical Department.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur department comprises faculty, trainees, advanced practice providers (APPs), and research and administrative staff. While ingenuity exists in all of these groups, most lack the skills necessary for effective innovation. Institutional barriers may also exist, preventing progress beyond the initial idea. We established a novel and reproducible framework and pathway to facilitate device and technological innovation in our academic surgical department. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe developed a pathway and an education program to support department members with novel ideas for innovation. Our department's structure was redefined to include innovation, and all employees were invited to participate. We developed relationships with subject-matter experts (SMEs); industries; and university science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and business programs to collaborate on device and technology innovations.
resultsUsing our framework, we founded three start-up companies, began developing eight devices and three apps, and filed two patents with additional intellectual property (IP) protection to follow. In total, 21 departmental employees, including APPs, an administrator, research staff, a fellow, and faculty members, engaged in innovation-related activities. To foster healthcare innovation, we also created a novel university-based, cross-industry innovation curriculum, and identified funding sources for prototyping and development.
conclusionsWe established a framework to facilitate innovation in our department. We developed innovation expertise, leveraged external industry collaborations, and increased engagement from the faculty and staff. We also successfully used external resources, resulting in a scalable innovation pathway for developing needs-driven clinical solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41276766What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.