ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2025
Gentrification, Racial Demographics, and Indicators of Community Conditions in Allegheny County.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gentrification is a process of neighborhood change characterized by capital investment in historically disinvested neighborhoods and an influx of residents of higher socioeconomic status. While gentrification generates neighborhood improvements that benefit newcomers, it has been recognized as a public health issue characterized by inequities in housing, economic, and health opportunities for long-term residents, specifically low-income and Black populations, who are at high risk of physical and social displacement. Thus, this cross-sectional ecological study based in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, sought to (1) identify the relationships between gentrification status and three neighborhood-level indices representing housing conditions, socioeconomic conditions, and environmental conditions and (2) determine whether the rate of the Black population change from 2010 to 2020 modified these relationships. We used separate logistic regression models for three neighborhood-level indices to quantify the relationship between each index and gentrifying census tracts compared with census tracts that were eligible for gentrification but did not gentrify. Gentrifying census tracts were statistically associated with stronger housing markets (i.e., higher housing value) (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.57-0.77), lower levels of community need (OR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.27-0.65), and lower levels of environmental burden (OR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.47-0.81) than nongentrifying census tracts were. Because higher index values indicate worse outcomes, these results suggest that gentrifying tracts had relatively better housing market conditions, lower community need, and reduced environmental burden compared to nongentrifying tracts. The rate of Black population change had a marginal interaction effect with each of the indices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41276760What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.