Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276752›Full record

ArticleDiscover mental health2025

Investigating mental wellbeing self-care in higher education using BERTopic modeling.

Mahmoud Ali, Niels van Berkel, Benjamin Tag, Ville Paananen, Jonas Oppenlaender, Koji Yatani, Simo Hosio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mahmoud AliUniversity of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. mahmoud.ali@oulu.fi.
Niels van BerkelAalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5106-7692
Benjamin TagUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7831-2632
Ville PaananenUniversity of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7377-9770
Jonas OppenlaenderUniversity of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2342-1540
Koji YataniUniversity of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4192-0420
Simo HosioUniversity of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9609-0965

Funding

Research Council of Finland 349637Research Council of Finland 353790Research Council of Finland 356128Strategic Research Council 335625Strategic Research Council 335729Strategic Research Council 356128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addressing the mental wellbeing of higher education students is urgent, given rising distress rates and significant help-seeking gaps. Students face various life challenges ranging from academic pressure and career concerns to global issues like climate change, all of which may negatively impact their mental wellbeing. While appropriate self-care can mitigate these challenges, understanding the strategies students use independently is key to developing accessible support. This article analyses contemporary triggers for mental distress and the corresponding self-care strategies adopted by students, based on data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic. We then discuss how these findings can inform the design of future digital mental wellbeing solutions. We conducted an online study with 810 participants, utilizing computational methods to analyse open-ended data. We present insights into prevalent challenges and self-care strategies, deriving direct implications for design. Finally, we discuss how technology designers can contribute to effective mental wellbeing solutions based on our findings.

Indexed as

BERTopicHigher educationMental wellbeingSelfcare

Identifiers

PMID41276752
PMCPMC12748339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.