ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Acoustic Detection of Intracranial Cavitation Induced by Blunt Impacts in Polyacrylamide Human Head Models Across Varying Orientations.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTraumatic brain injury remains a major health concern among civilians and military personnel, with intracranial cavitation hypothesized as a damage mechanism during blunt impacts.
methodsThis study examines cavitation bubble activity in simplified polyacrylamide human head models, focusing on different anatomical regions and imaging modalities. A drop tower setup with high-speed acoustic and optical imaging was used to characterize the onset, expansion, and collapse of bubbles and assess the impact orientation's effects.
resultsAcoustic plane wave imaging and passive cavitation detection captured emissions linked to bubble dynamics. Although plane wave imaging was affected by reflections, it detected bubble growth effectively. In contrast, passive cavitation detection showed greater sensitivity during collapse, with broadband spectral responses. Signal processing extracted relevant spectral features from both modalities, regardless of pre-existing bubble nuclei. Cavitation behavior varied across models, with impact angle influencing both timing and persistence, suggesting orientation affects injury mechanisms. When the head model was impacted at a 90° angle and observed along the central sulcus, cavitation onset occurred earliest with the strongest shockwave reflections, likely due to changes in wave travel distance between the coup and contrecoup sites. Head models with artificial dampeners showed that the scalp and dura mater layers reduced cavitation intensity, though cavitation remained detectable.
conclusionThis work supports the feasibility of acoustically detecting impact-induced cavitation as a standalone tool, informing strategies for transcranial monitoring and protective gear design in blunt trauma scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.