SynthesisJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025
Psychometric Properties of the SarQoL Questionnaire: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychometric Properties of the SarQoL Questionnaire: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Sarcopenia and Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire is recognized as the only disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for assessing sarcopenia-related HRQoL. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide a quantitative summary of all evidence reported on the reliability, validity, responsiveness and floor/ceiling effects of SarQoL in older adults.
methodsFollowing PRISMA-COSMIN guidelines, a systematic search for studies evaluating the psychometric properties of SarQoL (i.e., reliability, validity, responsiveness and floor and ceiling effects) in older people was conducted on MEDLINE (via OVID), PsycINFO, Scopus and EMBASE. Studies published between 2013 and November 2024 using a consensual definition of sarcopenia were included. Study selection and data extraction were made by two independent reviewers. A random-effects model meta-analysis was applied. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024546880.
resultsFrom 411 studies identified by the search strategy, 25 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including 4585 community-dwelling individuals, of which 1311 were diagnosed as sarcopenic. SarQoL demonstrated high reliability (pooled Cronbach's alpha values consistently exceeding 0.80) and excellent test-retest reliability (pooled ICC = 0.98). Construct validity was confirmed with strong convergent correlations (pooled r > 0.54) with related dimensions of generic SF-36 and EQ-5D and weaker divergent correlations (pooled r < 0.47). Responsiveness, evaluated in two studies using different methodologies, supported the ability of SarQoL to detect meaningful changes in HRQoL. The certainty of evidence was rated as high for reliability, validity and responsiveness.
conclusionThis meta-analysis consolidates a decade of evidence and confirms the strong psychometric properties of SarQoL, with a high level of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.