ArticleAmino acids2025
Evaluation of the antimicrobial-cytotoxic activities and molecular docking study of L-cysteine ethyl ester and L-cysteine methyl ester.
Article in Amino acids, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Biological Evaluation of Some Amino Acids Esters: A Study on Antimicrobial, Antibiofilm, and Molecular Docking.ACS omega · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance is a growing problem in the treatment of life-threatening diseases. Recently, a variety of covalent drugs have emerged. Cysteine is one of the least abundant amino acids in the proteins of many organisms, and the thiol group in its structure makes it unique and has become a common covalent amino acid residue in covalent drug development. Therefore, it is important to conduct research on cysteine derivatives. In this study, the in vitro antibacterial activity of L-cysteine esters were tested against Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative Escherichia coli using the modified microdilution broth method. In vitro cytotoxic activities of the esters were carried out against the healthy HEK293T cell line and well-differentiated liver cancer cell lines PLC/PRF/5 and HEP3B at different concentrations by using an MTS assay. In addition, molecular docking studies, ADMET properties, and drug-likeness were also reported. The results obtained are new and it is thought that these results of the study will contribute to the development of new synthesizable cysteine-based drugs. In conclusion, a thorough examination of the frontier orbital (HOMO and LUMO) and MEP studies was conducted using quantum chemistry techniques to determine the molecule's reactivity, electrophilic and nucleophilic sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.