Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276704›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

Closing the data gap: leveraging pretrained neural networks for robotic surgical assessment on limited clinical data.

Nasseh Hashemi, Matias Mose, Lasse R Østergaard, Flemming Bjerrum, Erik Søgaard-Andersen, Knud Fabrin, Grazvydas Tuckus, Mikkel L Friis, Sten Rasmussen, Martin G Tolsgaard

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06612606 (Transfer Learning of a Pretrained Preclinical Neural Network for Robotic Surgical Assessment on Limited Clinical Data), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06612606 completednot on this map

Transfer Learning of a Pretrained Preclinical Neural Network for Robotic Surgical Assessment on Limited Clinical Data

TypeobservationalSponsorAalborg UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled5ConditionsRobot SurgeryArmsobservational study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nasseh HashemiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. nasseh.hashemi@gmail.com.
Matias MoseDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Lasse R ØstergaardDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Flemming BjerrumCenter for Human Resources and Education, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Erik Søgaard-AndersenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Knud FabrinDepartment of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Grazvydas TuckusDepartment of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Mikkel L FriisDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Sten RasmussenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Martin G TolsgaardNordsim - Centre for Skills Training and Simulation, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn robot-assisted surgery (RAS), surgical assessment is critical for ensuring competence and achieving optimal surgical outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based assessment offers an alternative to expert-based assessment but often requires large datasets, which are challenging to obtain. Transfer learning with pretrained algorithms may offer a potential solution and could reduce the need for clinical data. This study explores the use of transfer learning with preclinical porcine data to reduce the clinical data needed for action recognition (AC) and skills assessment (SA) in RAS.

methodsAbdominal, thoracic and urologic RAS procedures were video recorded. A convolutional neural network (CNN) with a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) layer, initially trained using preclinical data, was applied to the clinical dataset through three strategies; (1) direct application on the clinical dataset, (2) only training the LSTM and dense layers, and (3) retraining the entire network. For comparison, a baseline model was trained from scratch on clinical data.

resultsRecordings from 15 procedures were included. The baseline clinical model achieved accuracies of 82.7% (AC) and 40.8% (SA). Direct application of the pretrained network resulted in accuracies of 84.8% (AC) and 51.6% (SA). Fine-tuning the LSTM and dense layers of the pretrained network yielded accuracies of 90.1% (AC) and 60.4 (SA), while retraining all layers achieved 90.5% (AC) and 57.6% (SA). Ablation analysis demonstrated higher accuracies with less data using transfer learning, 87.9% vs. 81.6%.

conclusionsUsing pretrained preclinical AI models increases the accuracy of models trained on limited clinical data and reduces the need for clinical data. PUBLIC TRIAL REGISTRY: www.clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT06612606).

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceNeural Networks, ComputerRobotic Surgical ProceduresAlgorithmsAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansLong Short Term MemorySoft ComputingSwineTransfer Machine LearningClinical dataData ablationDeep learningRobotic surgeryTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41276704
PMCPMC12641048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.