Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276667›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Cautionary lessons from real-world testing of GPT-4.1 AI for pediatric foreign body aspiration.

Sholem Hack, Rebecca Attal, Dana Elazar, Yaniv Alon, Raphael Meyuchas, Adva Livne, Ory Madgar, Mor Saban

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Utility of Large Language Models to Assist With Emergency Triage Decisions Within Otolaryngology.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sholem HackCity St. George's University London School of Medicine, Program Delivered by University of Nicosia at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel. sholemhack1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0651-6994
Rebecca AttalCity St. George's University London School of Medicine, Program Delivered by University of Nicosia at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Dana ElazarTouro College of Osteopathic Medicine - Montana, MT, Great Falls, USA.
Yaniv AlonNursing Department, The Stanley Steyer School of Health Professions, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Ramat Aviv, 69978, Israel.
Raphael MeyuchasDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Adva LivneDeepVision Lab, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Emek Haela St. 1, Ramat Gan, 52621, Israel.
Ory Madgar *Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Mor Saban *Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of a multimodal large language model (GPT-4.1) in detecting pediatric airway foreign body aspiration (FBA) using real-world clinical and radiographic data.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 58 pediatric patients evaluated for suspected airway FBA at a tertiary academic hospital between 2015 and 2024. Each case combined structured clinical data and chest radiographs obtained at the time of emergency-department presentation, with bronchoscopy serving as the diagnostic reference standard. GPT-4.1, a vision-enabled large language model, classified cases as right-bronchus aspiration, left-bronchus aspiration, or no aspiration. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.

resultsThe model achieved an overall accuracy of 62.3%, with precision of 23.3%, recall of 19.0%, and an F1-score of 0.21. While it correctly identified 34 of 46 cases without aspiration, it detected only 4 of 12 confirmed bronchial-aspiration cases and missed all left-bronchus aspirations.

conclusionsThis proof-of-concept feasibility study highlights substantial limitations of a general-purpose multimodal AI model in pediatric airway triage. The low recall and high misclassification rates suggest that vision-enabled language models require task-specific training and rigorous validation before clinical implementation. Nevertheless, when used as an adjunct rather than a replacement for bronchoscopy, such models may eventually support triage decisions in resource-limited settings if further optimized and prospectively validated.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBronchiForeign BodiesRespiratory AspirationBronchoscopyChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesBronchoscopyChest radiograph interpretationDiagnostic accuracyForeign body aspirationLarge language modelPediatric airway

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.