Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276666›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Smell and taste dysfunction after total laryngectomy: A cross-sectional study comparing patient and physician perspectives.

Yaşar Enez Bilen, Nidanur Sinanoğlu, Çağrı Külekci

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yaşar Enez BilenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine Sihhiye, Ankara, 06100, Turkey. yasarenesbilen0@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7660-6441
Nidanur SinanoğluHacettepe University School of Medicine, Medical Student Sihhiye, Ankara, 06100, Turkey. nidanursinanoglu@gmail.com.
Çağrı KülekciDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine Sihhiye, Ankara, 06100, Turkey. cagrikulekci@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4981-7711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTotal laryngectomy disrupts nasal airflow, often resulting in significant olfactory and gustatory dysfunction. While these sensory losses may adversely affect patients' quality of life and psychological well-being, they typically receive less clinical attention compared to voice and pulmonary complications. This study aims to evaluate the extent of smell and taste dysfunction after total laryngectomy and to compare the perceptions of these impairments between patients and otolaryngologists.

methodsA structured survey was conducted with 32 patients who had undergone total laryngectomy and 47 otolaryngologists. Both groups responded to items on sensory dysfunction, its effects on daily and psychological well-being, clinical attention to these symptoms, and openness to rehabilitation.

resultsPatients reported notable taste and smell impairments affecting daily life and emotions, yet physicians frequently underestimated these sensory issues. No statistically significant correlation was found between patient and physician responses regarding the perceived severity or psychological impact of sensory loss (p > 0.05). In contrast, a significant correlation (p < 0.05) between patients' willingness to use an assistive device and the physicians' readiness to recommend it.

conclusionTaste and smell loss post-laryngectomy remains underrecognized in clinical practice. Greater clinical awareness and early rehabilitative support are needed.

Indexed as

LaryngectomyOlfaction DisordersOtolaryngologistsPostoperative ComplicationsTaste DisordersAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesGustatory dysfunctionOlfactory dysfunctionPatient–physician perspectiveQuality of lifeTotal laryngectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.