Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276665›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Treatment outcomes in p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC): A real-world retrospective data from a low-middle income countries (LMIC).

Rohith R Menon, Trinanjan Basu, Jay Prakash Sahu, Shounak J Kamat, Ghazala K Roshan, Ajinkya U Gadekar, Komal J Parwani, Parv Modi, Riddhijyoti Talukdar, Durva Kurkure

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rohith R MenonRadiation Oncology, HCG Cancer Center, Mumbai, 400092, India.
Trinanjan BasuRadiation Oncology, HCG Cancer Center, Mumbai, 400092, India. trinanjan.doctor@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5412-6918
Jay Prakash SahuRadiation Oncology, HCG Cancer Center, Mumbai, 400092, India.
Shounak J KamatRadiation Oncology, HCG Cancer Center, Mumbai, 400092, India.
Ghazala K RoshanRadiation Oncology, HCG Cancer Center, Mumbai, 400092, India.
Ajinkya U GadekarRadiation Oncology, HCG Cancer Center, Mumbai, 400092, India.
Komal J ParwaniRadiation Oncology, HCG Cancer Center, Mumbai, 400092, India.
Parv ModiRadiation Oncology, HCG Cancer Center, Mumbai, 400092, India.
Riddhijyoti TalukdarRadiation Oncology, HCG Cancer Center, Mumbai, 400092, India.
Durva KurkureRadiation Oncology, HCG Cancer Center, Mumbai, 400092, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiterature on contemporary outcomes of p16-negative OPSCC in India are limited, with existing evidence suggesting poorer prognosis compared to HPV-positive disease. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of patients with p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) who were treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to a total dose of 66-70 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks. The majority of patients received concurrent chemotherapy while a smaller proportion were treated with radiotherapy alone.

resultsThis retrospective study evaluated treatment outcomes in 181 patients with p16-negative (OPSCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy or Radiation therapy (RT) alone between 2017 and 2024. All patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to 66-70 Gy in 33 fractions with 79% receiving concurrent chemotherapy, primarily weekly cisplatin. Median follow-up was 25 months. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 21.5% of patients while distant metastases developed in 26%. The 3 year overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 65% and 73%, respectively.

conclusionDespite adherence to protocol-based therapy, treatment failures especially distant relapses-remain common, underscoring the aggressive nature of p16-negative disease. Acute toxicities were comparable to available literature but manageable. These findings highlight the need for novel systemic strategies and biomarker-driven treatment intensification in this high-risk subgroup, particularly in resource-limited settings where the burden of p16-negative OPSCC remains high.

Indexed as

Oropharyngeal NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAdultAgedChemoradiotherapyCisplatinCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Developing CountriesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesCisplatinCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16ChemoradiationHPVLMICOropharynxOutcomeP16 negative

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.