Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276661›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

The prognostic value of lymphatic vessel density in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aikaterini Marini, Roubini Zakopoulou, Georgios Ntritsos, Kalliopi Iliou, Christos Giannousis, Dimitrios Varvarousis, Panagiotis Kitsoulis, Thomas Iraklis Smyris, Asimakis Asimakopoulos, Theocharis Chatzoglou

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Association ofInternational journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aikaterini MariniMedical School, Laboratory of Anatomy-Histology-Embryology, University of Ioannina, Campus of University of Ioannina, Ioannina, 45110, Greece. marinikaat@yahoo.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0763-624X
Roubini ZakopoulouDepartment of Oncology, General Oncology Hospital of Kifisia, Athens, Greece.
Georgios NtritsosDepartment of Economics, School of Economics and Management Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Kalliopi IliouSchool of Health Sciences, University of Western Macedonia, Ptolemaida, Greece.
Christos GiannousisDepartment of Advanced Informatics and Computing Systems - Software Development and Αrtificial Intelligence, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece.
Dimitrios VarvarousisMedical School, Laboratory of Anatomy-Histology-Embryology, University of Ioannina, Campus of University of Ioannina, Ioannina, 45110, Greece.
Panagiotis KitsoulisMedical School, Laboratory of Anatomy-Histology-Embryology, University of Ioannina, Campus of University of Ioannina, Ioannina, 45110, Greece.
Thomas Iraklis SmyrisMedical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Asimakis AsimakopoulosJacques Lisfranc School of Medicine, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.
Theocharis ChatzoglouMedical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSquamous cell carcinoma of the tongue (TSCC) is the most common cancer of the oral cavity accounting for 25-40% of the cases. Its unfavorable prognosis is partly attributed to the high incidence of lymph node metastasis, while lymphatic vessel density (LVD) is a potential predictor of tumor progression, metastasis, and patient survival. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis, that evaluates the prognostic significance of LVD regarding nodal metastasis in TSCC, focusing on intratumoral and peritumoral LVD.

methodsThe studies included referred to patients with TSCC who underwent tumor resection and LVD was estimated via immunohistochemistry (D2-40, LYVE-1). Literature search and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Hazard ratios (HRs) and mean differences were calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects models and heterogeneity was assessed via I² statistics. A total of 26 studies were identified, with 6 meeting eligibility criteria.

resultsThe principal outcome was the significant association between high overall LVD and increased nodal metastasis (summary mean difference: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.21, 1.49; p= 0.010, I²=77.6%). No statistically significant association was observed for intratumoral (summary HR: 0.23; 95% CI: -0.45, 0.92; p = 0.501, I²=81%) or peritumoral LVD (summary HR: 0.10; 95% CI: -0.80, 0.99; p = 0.832, I²=89.8%).

conclusionThe major conclusion of this study is that overall LVD is an indicator of aggressiveness of TSCC and a negative prognostic factor strongly associated with nodal metastasis. LVD assessment can improve risk stratification and lead to personalized treatment approaches in TSCC management.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellLymphatic VesselsTongue NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisPrognosisIntratumoral lymphatic vessel densityLymphatic vessel densityLymph node metastasisOverall lymphatic vessel densityPeritumoral lymphatic vessel densitySquamous cell carcinoma of the tongueTumor prognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.