ReviewJournal of anesthesia2026
Low-dose spinal anesthesia in cesarean section: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal anesthesia is the technique of choice for cesarean delivery, offering rapid onset and reliable anesthesia, but conventional intrathecal doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine frequently cause significant hypotension and delayed recovery. Low-dose spinal anesthesia (LDSA), generally defined as ≤ 8 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine, often combined with intrathecal opioids, has been investigated as a strategy to mitigate these effects. Current evidence indicates that LDSA can attenuate hemodynamic fluctuations and reduce intraoperative nausea without compromising neonatal outcomes; however, excessively low doses may increase the risk of incomplete block and conversion to general anesthesia. While LDSA may be advantageous in patients with cardiovascular compromise, routine dose reduction for all parturients is not supported by existing data. Thus, LDSA represents a context-specific alternative within modern obstetric anesthesia practice, with benefits and limitations that must be weighed against established prophylactic strategies for managing spinal-induced hypotension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41276653What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.