ArticleScientific reports2025
Explainable machine learning framework for assessing groundwater quality and trace element contamination in Eastern Saudi Arabia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Groundwater quality in arid regions like Al Hassa, Saudi Arabia, is increasingly threatened by trace element contamination driven by human activity and natural geology. This study addresses the urgent need for data-driven tools to assess groundwater pollution in the region’s multi-aquifer system. Groundwater samples were analyzed for trace elements and main physicochemical parameters. Using supervised machine learning (ML) models—Linear Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM)—the Water Pollution Index (WPI) was predicted as a holistic metric of contamination. The GBM model outperformed all others, achieving a training coefficient of determination (DC) of 0.9970 and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0017. During testing, it maintained a high DC of 0.9372 and an MAE of 0.0063, confirming its strong generalization ability. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to rank feature importance and enhance model transparency. The most influential variables for WPI prediction were chromium (Cr, SHAP = 0.0214), aluminum (Al, SHAP = 0.0136), and strontium (Sr, SHAP = 0.0053), followed by Fe (0.0031), V (0.0028), and Se (0.0017). Despite generally acceptable water quality, elements such as Cr and Fe exceeded safe limits in several samples. This study presents a transparent, high-performing framework for groundwater quality assessment in arid conditions. The integration of explainable ML offers clear, actionable insights into sustainable water management and environmental decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.