ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of ecological niche and interspecific associations among dominant zooplankton species in the major lakes of Yinchuan City, China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Zooplankton are crucial primary consumers in lake ecosystems, and clarifying their niche characteristics and interspecific relationships is vital for comprehending species interactions and improving community stability. We conducted a seasonal study in 2020 on zooplankton and associated physicochemical parameters in representative lakes of Yinchuan City. Using niche width, niche overlap, variance ratio, Chi-square test, and association coefficient, we mainly analyzed the ecological niches of dominant species and their interspecific associations. The findings indicated 46 zooplankton species across four main phyla, with the dominant species counts in January, April, July, and October being 7, 20, 20, and 18, respectively. The primary factors fluctuated during the months. In total, five factors demonstrated the most significant explanatory capacity: DO, EC, NO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.