ArticleScientific reports2025
Risk factors associated with higher skin age relative to chronological age in community-dwelling middle-aged Japanese adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin condition reflects both chronological aging and overall health, yet few studies have examined its links to lifestyle or cardiovascular risk factors in Asian populations. In 2023, 527 Japanese adults aged 40–64 years underwent facial imaging with the VISIA Evolution, which estimated skin age and quantified eight skin parameters. The difference between skin and chronological age, derived from linear regression residuals, was analyzed for associations with lifestyle and cardiovascular factors using multiple regression. A greater skin–chronological age difference was significantly associated with higher scores on all eight skin parameters. In multivariable-adjusted models, male sex, higher systolic blood pressure, elevated γ-GTP, smoking, reduced grip strength, and frequent occupational sun exposure were associated with greater skin–chronological age difference. Sex-specific multiple regression identified systolic blood pressure, blood glucose, smoking, reduced grip strength, and sun exposure in women, and systolic blood pressure, serum γ-GTP, alcohol intake, reduced grip strength, and sun exposure in men. The present cross-sectional analysis showed that cardiovascular and metabolic health, as well as smoking and sunlight exposure, were associated with skin aging objectively assessed by facial imaging. Although causality cannot be inferred, improving systemic health may help promote healthier skin aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.