ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Vaccine acceptance and associated factors among parents of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a comparative cross-sectional study with healthy controls.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) are at high risk for vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs); timely and complete vaccination, including both routine and special risk-based vaccines, is crucial. Vaccine hesitancy and refusal are increasing worldwide, and parental hesitancy poses a serious threat to children's health, especially in high-risk groups. This study aimed to evaluate vaccine acceptance among parents of children with T1DM and healthy controls using the validated Turkish version of the Vaccine Acceptance Instrument (VAI), and to identify factors associated with vaccine hesitancy as well as potential solutions. This cross-sectional primary data collection study was conducted in Türkiye with 539 parents (264 with T1DM and 275 healthy controls). Sociodemographic data, vaccination characteristics of children and parents, concerns about vaccines, and sources of vaccine information were collected via a questionnaire, and vaccine acceptance was assessed using the VAI. Being in the upper quartile (Q4) of the VAI total and subscale scores was defined as high vaccine acceptance, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify predictors. Parents of children with T1DM had significantly lower VAI total and subscale scores compared to those in the control group (p < 0.05). Vaccine acceptance was considered low in the T1DM group. Maternal participation as the survey respondent, having a higher education and higher income, being employed, receiving non-routine vaccinations, obtaining vaccine information from healthcare professionals or books/journals, and both parents being vaccinated against COVID-19 were significantly associated with higher vaccine acceptance. A history of vaccine-related side effects was associated with lower acceptance rates. Conclusion: Vaccine acceptance among parents of children with T1DM was significantly lower than healthy controls. Personalized interventions targeting low-income families, fathers, and individuals who have previously experienced vaccine-related adverse effects are needed.Trust-based, empathetic, targeted, and scientifically informed communication between healthcare professionals and vaccine-hesitant individuals is crucial. Increasing vaccine acceptance among parents of children with T1DM is important for preventing VPDs in this high-risk group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41276630What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.