ArticleScientific reports2025
Distribution bias embedding tuning of vision transformer for remote sensing object detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The expanded availability of remote sensing data in recent years has yielded an increasing demand for advanced object detection methods to support Earth observation applications. Vision Transformers (ViTs) have recently emerged as a powerful backbone in the field of visual recognition, achieving exceptional performance in various tasks. However, adapting the pretrained ViTs to specific downstream tasks, particularly in remote sensing, represents a challenge due to the different distribution between the pretraining and downstream task datasets. To address this challenge, this paper introduces the distribution bias embedding-based tuning (DBET) method. DBET integrates a bias embedding token, which dynamically adjusts the feature representations to better align the distribution bias between the pretraining and downstream task datasets. DBET also reduces the number of parameters that require fine-tuning, thus significantly improving computational efficiency and reducing training time while maintaining the original structure unchanged. DBET is verified by experimental evaluations on benchmark datasets, including the DOTA-v1.0, RarePlanes, and EAGLE datasets. The results demonstrate that DBET can not only reduce the number of trainable parameters and accelerate the fine-tuning process but can also significantly improve accuracy, particularly for tasks with a limited number of categories, providing a scalable solution for remote sensing object detection. The DBET method achieved a recognition accuracy of 56.94% on the EAGLE dataset, 80.56% on the five-class RarePlanes dataset, and 70.68% on the DOTA-v1.0 dataset. Moreover, the DBET method reduced the average training time to 58% of full fine-tuning method.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.