Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276577›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An improved grey wolf optimizer with multi-stage differentiation strategies coverage in three-dimensional wireless sensor network.

Zhenkun Liu, Yun Ou, Shuanghu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhenkun LiuSchool of Communication and Electronic Engineering, Jishou University, Jishou, 416000, China.
Yun OuSchool of Communication and Electronic Engineering, Jishou University, Jishou, 416000, China. yun_ou@jsu.edu.cn.
Shuanghu WangSchool of Communication and Electronic Engineering, Jishou University, Jishou, 416000, China.

Funding

the Hunan Provincial Undergraduate Innovation Training Program S202510531096the National Natural Science Foundation of China 62266019the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China 2024JJ7395the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China 2025JJ60926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) play a vital role in bridging the physical and digital worlds, enabling real-time data collection for IoT applications. However, optimizing coverage in three-dimensional (3D) WSNs with complex terrains remains a significant challenge, as traditional two-dimensional models fail to reflect real-world spatial dynamics. This paper proposes an improved Grey Wolf Optimizer with Multi-Stage Differentiation Strategies (IGWO-MSDS) to enhance 3D WSN coverage while reducing deployment cost and improving coverage efficiency. The algorithm introduces three key enhancements: (1) a split-pheromone guidance strategy in the early iteration stage to boost information exchange among agents; (2) a hybrid Grey Wolf-Artificial Bee Colony strategy during the mid-stage to balance global exploration and local exploitation; and (3) a Lévy flight mechanism in the late stage to refine search performance. IGWO-MSDS was evaluated through extensive simulations and compared with GWO, SSA, WOA, GOA, OGWO, DGWO1, and DGWO2. Results show that IGWO-MSDS achieves superior performance across key metrics, including optimal coverage, average coverage, and standard deviation. The proposed approach provides a scalable and energy-efficient solution for 3D WSN deployment, contributing to the advancement of IoT systems in complex environments.

Identifiers

PMID41276577
PMCPMC12748681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.