ArticleScientific reports2025
Susceptibility of a peri-urban water supply and sanitation system to selected emerging micropollutants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As cities expand and human activity increases, peri-urban areas – regions on the outskirts of cities – are developing rapidly. This affects water quality including pollutants and antibiotic resistant bacteria and genes. While urban water systems have been studied extensively, peri-urban water systems are less understood. Researchers tested water and sewage quality at seven locations in a peri-urban area serving over 2,500 people during spring and winter. The research results showed that microplastics were not present in samples of raw or tap water, or in treated sewage. However, microplastics were found in raw sewage, raising environmental and health concerns. Antibiotic resistance genes were present in most samples except for drinking water from the supply network though it still contained some microorganisms. After sewage was discharged into a river antibiotic resistance gene levels increased by about 50%. The most common resistance genes in raw sewage were tetA and blaTEM. Wastewater treatment effectively removed over 90% of integrase genes in both seasons helping to reduce the spread of resistance. These results show the need for more research to understand and address water contamination risks in peri-urban areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.