Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276559›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Perceived threat from minorities decreases with increased societal threat after the 2021 military coup in Myanmar.

Daan Vandermeulen, Kinneret Endevelt, Amit Goldenberg, Eran Halperin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daan VandermeulenHebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. daan.vandermeule@mail.huji.ac.il.
Kinneret EndeveltHebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Amit GoldenbergHarvard Business School, Boston, USA.
Eran HalperinHebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

European Research Council 864347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Societies are often comprised of majority group members who feel threatened by minorities, which, in return, are denied equal rights. How do perceived societal threats, which impact both majorities and minorities, influence perceived minority threat and the support for their rights? We utilized the February 2021 Myanmar coup (Burma)-which has been perceived as threatening by most majority and minority citizens-to examine this question in a three-sample cross-sectional survey. A first sample was conducted before the coup. The second (immediately after) and third (one year after) were aimed to understand short- and long-term differences in perceived minority threat following the coup. Perceived minority threat decreased after the coup with increased perceived societal threat (sample 2) and increased back again when perceived societal threat diminished (sample 3). Lowered perceived minority threat was also associated with higher support for minority rights. Our results reveal the dynamic nature of group-relevant threats using a unique non-WEIRD sample.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelMinority GroupsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyanmarSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultMilitary coupMinority rightsMyanmarNon-WEIRD samplesThreat

Identifiers

PMID41276559
PMCPMC12738759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.