ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring the synergy between aluminum powder and silica fume in enhancing lightweight concrete characteristics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Environmentally Friendly Foam Concrete with Fly Ash Modified with Micro- and Nano-SiOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lightweight concrete effectively maintains structural integrity while subtly reducing the load imposed by traditional dead load limits. The current study aims to investigate the synergistic effects that can result from combining silica fume and aluminum powder in lightweight concrete. Silica fume was added to replace OPC because it has a lower density, significantly reducing the overall density of the concrete. An experimental design approach was used to examine the combined effects of aluminum powder and silica fume. In concrete, silica fume was incorporated at varying proportions to replace cement: 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. As an aerating agent, aluminum powder was added at different proportions, including 0%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.5%, and 0.7%. A series of experiments was conducted to assess the fresh, mechanical, and durability characteristics of the concrete, all of which are critical for lightweight concrete. It was observed that adding aluminum powder reduces strength, while silica fume improves it. Specifically, 20% replacement of OPC with silica fume increased compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, and modulus of elasticity by 7.64%, 5.68%, 4.40%, and 3.30%, respectively. It was also found that adding aluminum powder and silica fume decreases the dry density of the concrete. Models were developed using response surface methodology, and mathematical equations were created to predict response outcomes. All responses were optimized through multi-response optimization, and experimental validation was performed to confirm the optimized results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.