Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276543›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative evaluation of play environment design elements in autism schools using AHP and GRA.

Jingjing Chen, Alice Sabrina Ismail, Xiaojie Xie

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jingjing ChenFaculty of Built Environment and Surveying, University Technology Malaysia, UTM Skudai, Johor, Malaysia. chenjingjing@graduate.utm.my.
Alice Sabrina IsmailFaculty of Built Environment and Surveying, University Technology Malaysia, UTM Skudai, Johor, Malaysia.
Xiaojie XieCollege of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Xuanwu District, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autistic children have unique cognitive, sensory, and social needs, and play environments are key to their development, yet existing research lacks systematic quantitative evaluation frameworks. This study fills this gap by evaluating key design elements of play environments in autism schools within the Yangtze River Delta Region through an integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) framework-an innovative methodological attempt in this field. Focusing on developmental outcomes for autistic children, the research systematically prioritizes ten critical design elements across four autism-specific institutions using structured expert evaluations. AHP assigned objective weights to each element, while GRA enabled a comparative assessment of environmental performance based on expert and teacher inputs. Results highlight safety and sensory-friendly design as the most critical factors, whereas personalization and spatial size showed lower significance. The findings advance evidence-based strategies for optimizing autism school play spaces, propose a balanced design framework harmonizing safety, sensory regulation, and social interaction, and provide support for formulating autism-friendly educational environment policies.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderEnvironment DesignPlay and PlaythingsSchoolsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleAnalytic hierarchy processAutism schoolsDesign elementsGrey relational analysisInclusive designPlay environmentsYangtze river delta

Identifiers

PMID41276543
PMCPMC12680714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.