ArticleNature communications2025
Manipulating mechanical strength of isoreticular two-dimensional polyamide materials via multiple interactions.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in protein-based detection and inhibition of AMR pathways.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anisotropic two-dimensional (2D) materials exhibit huge difference in the directions parallel and vertical to the plane, especially in mechanical properties, and the connecting interactions among 2D nanosheets dominates the bulk mechanical strength owing to the challenge to prepare continuous, single-crystal 2D material film at macroscopic scale. Herein, we report a series of isoreticular 2D polyamide materials and reveal that smaller structural units result in higher Young's modulus, while multiple weak forces including the hydrogen-bond, π-π and mismatched electrostatic interactions endows the bulk 2D materials superior elasticity, hardness and yield strength. Specifically, The Young's modulus and hardness of 2D polyamide film (GH-TMC) reach 35.6 GPa and 2.0 GPa, and the elastic recovery rate is as high as 60%, overwhelming the most polymer, metal and metal-organic framework (MOF)/covalent organic framework (COF) materials. The synergy of rigid small-ring units, high-density H-bond networks, and π-π/electrostatic interactions enable these films to bridge the gap between inorganic and polymeric materials, making them ideal for flexible electronics, high-performance protective coatings, and energy devices. The strategy via designing molecular structure and interactions among nanosheets in 2D materials enable us fabricate super 2D materials with overall mechanical strength.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.