SynthesisNature communications2025
Multidimensional β-diversity responses to global change: a meta-analysis highlighting divergent effects on plant communities.
Synthesis in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multidimensional β-diversity responses to global change: a meta-analysis highlighting divergent effects on plant communities.Nature communications · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the Anthropocene, global change is reshaping biological communities, potentially leading to widespread biotic homogenization-a worrying erosion of biological distinctiveness. However, the extent to which human activities have homogenized plant communities worldwide remains a pivotal unresolved question. To address this gap, we conduct a global meta-analysis of 1604 experimental and observational comparisons from 256 studies to assess the impacts of major global change drivers on plant β-diversity across its taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic dimensions. The findings indicate no significant net change in plant β-diversity globally, with responses varying markedly across global change factor types, biogeographic regions, ecosystems, and plant life forms. Specifically, climate change and biological invasions are consistently associated with reduced β-diversity, while land management (e.g., ecological restoration, reduced grazing, and controlled burning) is associated with increased β-diversity. The effects of land-use change (e.g., urbanization, habitat fragmentation, and infrastructure development) and multiple interacting factors are variable. Crucially, impacts differ across biodiversity dimensions. For instance, climate change is associated with reduced taxonomic and functional β-diversity but is associated with increased phylogenetic β-diversity. Our study calls for a shift in conservation focus from solely preventing species extinctions to addressing compositional changes in communities. It emphasizes the importance of functional and phylogenetic processes and the need to integrate all three biodiversity dimensions into monitoring and planning to maintain ecosystem resilience and evolutionary potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.