Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276536›Full record

SynthesisNature communications2025

Multidimensional β-diversity responses to global change: a meta-analysis highlighting divergent effects on plant communities.

Honglin Li, Peng Luo, Hao Yang, Ming Ni, Yue Cheng, Yu Huang, Wenwen Xie

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Honglin LiMountain Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province & Maoxian Mountain Ecosystem Research Station, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China.
Peng LuoMountain Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province & Maoxian Mountain Ecosystem Research Station, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China. luopeng@cib.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9436-8337
Hao YangMountain Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province & Maoxian Mountain Ecosystem Research Station, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China. yanghao@cib.ac.cn.
Ming NiMountain Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province & Maoxian Mountain Ecosystem Research Station, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China.
Yue ChengMountain Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province & Maoxian Mountain Ecosystem Research Station, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China.
Yu HuangMountain Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province & Maoxian Mountain Ecosystem Research Station, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China.
Wenwen XieSichuan Forestry Survey, Design & Research Institute Co. Ltd., Chengdu, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 42401055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Anthropocene, global change is reshaping biological communities, potentially leading to widespread biotic homogenization-a worrying erosion of biological distinctiveness. However, the extent to which human activities have homogenized plant communities worldwide remains a pivotal unresolved question. To address this gap, we conduct a global meta-analysis of 1604 experimental and observational comparisons from 256 studies to assess the impacts of major global change drivers on plant β-diversity across its taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic dimensions. The findings indicate no significant net change in plant β-diversity globally, with responses varying markedly across global change factor types, biogeographic regions, ecosystems, and plant life forms. Specifically, climate change and biological invasions are consistently associated with reduced β-diversity, while land management (e.g., ecological restoration, reduced grazing, and controlled burning) is associated with increased β-diversity. The effects of land-use change (e.g., urbanization, habitat fragmentation, and infrastructure development) and multiple interacting factors are variable. Crucially, impacts differ across biodiversity dimensions. For instance, climate change is associated with reduced taxonomic and functional β-diversity but is associated with increased phylogenetic β-diversity. Our study calls for a shift in conservation focus from solely preventing species extinctions to addressing compositional changes in communities. It emphasizes the importance of functional and phylogenetic processes and the need to integrate all three biodiversity dimensions into monitoring and planning to maintain ecosystem resilience and evolutionary potential.

Indexed as

BiodiversityClimate ChangePlantsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID41276536
PMCPMC12748994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.