ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessment of right ventricular function in patients after coronary artery bypass graft: a single center study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Echocardiographic predictors of cardiac improvement following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Additive predictive value of triglyceride-glucose index and epicardial adipose tissue volume for major adverse cardiovascular events following coronary artery bypass grafting.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Right ventricular dysfunction is a major risk factor in coronary artery disease. In patients undergoing revascularization for left ventricular ischemia, the incidence of RVD is reported in about 20%. This study aimed to assess right ventricular function as a possible risk factor in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft. This prospective study was conducted on 77 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. All cases were subjected to detailed medical history, full physical examination, electrocardiogram, routine laboratory tests including echocardiography or STE, and all parameters obtained before, within one week, and six months after surgery. Though LVEF preoperatively was comparable between the two study groups, LVEF one-week postoperatively was significantly lower in the RVD group compared to non RVD group; at the same time, there was a significant reduction in LVEF in both groups one week postoperatively compared to preoperatively, and this was more obvious in RVD group compared to non RVD group. Moreover, RVD developed shortly after CABG in less than one-third of our study population, but it recovered in most of them soon at the 6-month follow-up visit. It is suggested that in the early days after the CABG surgery, there is a decline in right ventricular function, which is relatively reversible at longer intervals (6 months after surgery). The right ventricular global longitudinal strain is a reliable way to address RVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.