Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276509›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Breast cancer and income loss in Denmark: heterogeneous outcomes and longitudinal effects.

Emily K Johnson, Harsh Parikh, Kim Rose Olsen, Angela Y Chang, Liza Sopina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily K JohnsonDanish Centre for Health Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. ejohnson@health.sdu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9213-9533
Harsh ParikhDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Kim Rose OlsenDanish Centre for Health Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Angela Y ChangDanish Centre for Health Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Liza SopinaDanish Centre for Health Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Income loss after breast cancer is an important area of research, but long-term impacts and heterogeneous effects are understudied. Here, we measure the effect of breast cancer on personal and household equivalized income of females in Denmark from 2000-2018 using Danish register data. We perform a cohort study and match on age, income, employment, comorbidities, healthcare utilization, and other socioeconomic and demographic variables at cohort entry, to investigate impacts across subpopulations over 10 years. We also perform an event study difference-in-difference analysis over the same period. Our study finds personal income loss averaging €7138 over 10 years in the non-retired population. The working population, students, and those in worse health suffer disproportionate loss. Household income losses are smaller and recover within 10 years. Overall, the Danish economic protections are effective in mitigating long-term economic impact of breast cancer, though there is room for improvement in protection of the most vulnerable.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsIncomeAdultAgedCohort StudiesDenmarkEmploymentFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedRegistriesSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID41276509
PMCPMC12749302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.