Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276264›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2025

Effects of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programmes on community rates of HPV-related disease and harms from vaccination.

Nicholas Henschke, Hanna Bergman, Brian S Buckley, Emma J Crosbie, Kerry Dwan, Su P Golder, Maria Kyrgiou, Yoon Kong Loke, Heather M McIntosh, Katrin Probyn and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Future of Vaccines.Vaccines · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nicholas HenschkeCochrane Response, The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9624-2519
Hanna BergmanCochrane Response, The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK.
Brian S BuckleyCochrane Response, The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK.
Emma J CrosbieDivision of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kerry DwanCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.
Su P GolderDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Maria KyrgiouIRDB, Department of Gut, Metabolism & Reproduction - Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Yoon Kong LokeNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Heather M McIntoshCochrane Response, The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK.
Katrin ProbynCochrane Response, The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK.
Gemma VillanuevaCochrane Response, The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK.
Jo MorrisonDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has the potential to enhance prevention of cervical cancer, especially in countries where screening programmes are currently unaffordable or impractical. Rare adverse events and longer-term benefits of HPV vaccination, such as effects on cancer rates, are difficult to examine in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and require large data from population-level studies to inform decision-making.

objectivesWe aimed to assess population-level effects of HPV vaccination programmes on HPV-related disease and harms from vaccination. SEARCH

methodsWe conducted electronic searches on 11 September 2024 in CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid Embase. We also searched vaccine manufacturer websites and checked reference lists from an index of HPV studies and other relevant systematic reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies that assessed the impact of HPV vaccination on the general population. This included population-level studies comparing outcomes before and after the introduction of HPV vaccine. We also included individual-level, non-randomised comparative studies, such as cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies and self-controlled case series. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used methods recommended by Cochrane. Two review authors carried out data extraction independently using pretested data extraction forms. We assessed the risk of bias of all included effect estimates using different tools according to study design. We carried out quantitative and qualitative data synthesis separately by outcome and study design. We performed meta-analysis on studies that reported effect estimates adjusted for confounding, with a focus on those receiving HPV vaccination at or before the age of 16 years (the target age group for vaccination). We rated the certainty of the evidence with GRADE. MAIN

resultsWe included 225 studies from 347 records in this review, evaluating over 132 million people. We included 86 cohort studies, four case-control studies, 46 cross-sectional studies, 69 pre-post vaccine introduction studies, five RCT extensions and two self-controlled case series. Thirteen additional studies reported on more than one type of analysis. Of the included studies, 177 reported only on females, 11 only males and 37 a combination of males and females. Risk of bias ranged from overall moderate risk to critical risk. Clinical outcomes There was moderate-certainty evidence from 20 studies that HPV vaccination reduces the incidence of cervical cancer. Five cohort studies including 4,390,243 females reported adjusted estimates showing a reduced risk of cervical cancer following HPV vaccination in the long term (risk ratio (RR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 0.56; I AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere are now long-term outcome data from different countries and from different study designs that consistently report a reduction in the development of high-grade CIN and cervical cancer in females vaccinated against HPV in early adolescence. Data show that there is greater benefit to vaccinating younger adolescents prior to becoming sexually active. There is evidence that HPV vaccination does not increase the risk of the most common adverse events reported on social media.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationAdolescentAdultBiasFemaleHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID41276264
PMCPMC12640735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.