ReviewIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal
Sudden cardiac death and the role of postmortem genetic testing in unexplained cases.
Review in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concealed cardiomyopathy in sudden childhood death: translation from molecular autopsy to family assessment.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Molecular mechanisms of sudden unexplained death and recent updates on molecular autopsy strategies for forensic investigation.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of genetic-molecular causes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - from patients to families: the GenetiCA study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- India-specific cardiogenetic aspects: Focus on cardiomyopathies and inherited arrhythmia syndromes.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is accountable for 10-20 % of deaths in Europe. While inherited and acquired structural heart disease underlie a considerable proportion, many SCDs remain unexplained after conventional autopsy. Lack of structural cardiac abnormalities in sudden death points towards the possibility of inherited heart disease, yet to manifest in observable changes. In fact, 70 % of SCDs in the young are potentially inherited, and causes may be familial hypercholesterolemia, cardiomyopathies, and primary arrhythmias syndromes. Early diagnosis of occult hereditary conditions and initiation of tailored prevention is key in risk reduction of SCD in relatives of deceased individuals. Postmortem genetic testing is recommended in potential inherited causes of SCD, with novel data showing the technique enables detection of concealed cardiomyopathies and channelopathies. Yet widespread implementation is impeded by a number of challenges, including lack of awareness among clinicians of the value of postmortem genetics. Current guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) advise both post-mortem genetic testing of the SCD victim with a potential inherited cause of death and testing of first-degree relatives to prevent future SCDs. Furthermore, it is recommended that specialists interpret findings, and that family evaluation takes place in multidisciplinary collaboration between cardiologists, pathologists, geneticists, and counsellors. This review provides a summary of contemporary knowledge on SCD, outlines guidelines for general forensic management and use of post-mortem genetic testing - including its interpretation, advantages, and challenges - and finally describes standard procedures for investigations of relatives to the deceased individual.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.