ReviewPharmaceutical biology2025
From kratom to 7-hydroxymitragynine: evolution of a natural remedy into a public-health threat.
Review in Pharmaceutical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- ACMT Position Statement: Public Health Risks of 7-Hydroxymitragynine and Other Kratom-Associated Compounds.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2026Article
- Perioperative Pain in the Era of Emerging and Unregulated Substances: Recognition, Risk Assessment, and Management.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Determination of mitragynine concentrations in medicolegal death investigations at the Oklahoma Office of the Chief Medical Examiner from 2022 to 2023.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
- Increases in Kratom-Related Reports to Poison Centers - National Poison Data System, United States, 2015-2025.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2026Article
- Observational real-world analysis of dose-dependent effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Observational characterization of self-reported SR-17018 exposure and outcomes in individuals with prior opioid use histories.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextKratom
methods'7-OH', '7-hydroxymitragynine', and 'kratom' were used as keywords; relevant literature was obtained from PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.
resultsPharmacological studies consistently identify 7-OH as a partial μ-opioid receptor agonist with nanomolar affinity, greater efficacy than mitragynine, and often exceeding the potency of morphine. Animal experiments demonstrate robust antinociceptive effects, respiratory depression, tolerance, dependence, and reinforcing properties characteristic of opioids. Human pharmacokinetic studies show systemic exposure after kratom ingestion, but concentrated 7-OH products bypass metabolic formation, producing markedly higher exposures. Regulatory surveillance, poison-center data, and marketplace audits confirm a rapid increase in availability and use of these products. State health departments have reported severe intoxications and fatalities. Clinical cases describe escalating use, medically managed withdrawal, and psychiatric destabilization, while forensic investigations document postmortem concentrations consistent with fatal opioid toxicity. Pediatric risk is amplified by developmental susceptibility, absence of age restrictions, and marketing in confectionary formats. Emerging analogues such as MGM-15 further extend this trajectory.
conclusionCollectively, the evidence demonstrates that concentrated 7-OH products are pharmacologically and toxicologically distinct from kratom leaf and pose significant risks of morbidity and mortality under typical conditions of use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.