ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026
Needs and opportunities for improvement in the management and monitoring of gynaecological cancer in Spain.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary management of advanced ovarian cancer in Spain: expert recommendations for achieving maximum survival and improving patient care.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe primary objective of this study is to identify opportunities to improve clinical and comprehensive support of patients diagnosed with gynaecological cancers in Spain. Secondary objectives included identifying the unmet needs regarding awareness and access to screening strategies of gynaecological cancers in Spain.
methodsA mixed-methods design was used, combining qualitative and quantitative research in 235 participants. The qualitative component comprised semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 12 patients with gynaecological cancer, 6 caregivers, and 11 healthcare professionals. The quantitative component included anonymous surveys from 44 women with gynaecological cancer and 162 women from the general population. Descriptive statistics were applied.
resultsThe qualitative study revealed needs in prevention, early diagnosis, emotional support, nutrition, physical activity, and sexual health. Among surveyed patients, the mean knowledge of gynaecological cancer before diagnosis was low (2.3/6). Substantial limitations were reported after diagnosis in physical activity (59%), diet (43%), and sexual life (70%), and 55% experienced psychological consequences. Fifty-six percent reported insufficient non-pharmacological information from their healthcare team, and 59% sought support from patient associations. In the general population, 40% of women had never received information on gynaecological cancer.
conclusionsImproving care for women with gynaecological cancers in Spain requires action at two levels: (1) strengthened early detection through awareness and screening strategies, and (2) expanded supportive services including nutrition, psycho-oncology, physical activity programmes, and sexual health interventions. Addressing taboos around women's sexuality and leveraging patient associations and preferred communication channels should be priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41275447What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.