ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Cosmetic and Quality of Life Outcomes of Supraclavicular vs Conventional Thyroidectomy Incisions in Unilateral Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe supraclavicular lateral incision approach offers a promising alternative to the conventional median incision in thyroid surgery, prioritizing cosmetic outcomes and quality of life (QoL) without compromising safety. This study evaluated its efficacy and impact on thyroid-specific QoL in patients undergoing thyroid lobectomy for unilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).
methodsA prospective, nonrandomized study was conducted on 197 PTC patients, including 98 treated with the supraclavicular approach and 99 with the conventional approach. Demographic, clinicopathologic, operative, and postoperative data were collected. Cosmetic satisfaction was assessed at six months post-surgery using visual analog scales, while thyroid-specific QoL was evaluated with the validated T-QoL questionnaire. Statistical analyses compared outcomes between the two groups.
resultsBoth approaches achieved comparable surgical outcomes, with no significant differences in operation time, blood loss, or complication rates. The supraclavicular approach demonstrated superior cosmetic satisfaction scores for incision scars (median 9 vs. 6, P = 0.001). Although overall T-QoL scores were similar, psychological well-being was significantly better in the supraclavicular group (P = 0.036), with a trend toward improved social well-being (P = 0.066). No recurrences were observed during a median follow-up of 28 months.
conclusionsThe supraclavicular lateral incision approach offers enhanced cosmetic outcomes and mitigates QoL decline without increasing surgical risks. It serves as a feasible, cost-effective alternative to conventional and remote-access techniques, aligning with contemporary trends in minimally invasive thyroid surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41275446What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.