Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41275436›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of implant dentistry2025

In Silico possibilities to understand peri-implant bone healing- state of the Art.

Gargi Shankar Nayak, Bilal Al-Nawas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of implant dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gargi Shankar NayakDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Bio-Mechanics & Materials group, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany. gargi.nayak@uni-mainz.de.
Bilal Al-NawasDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis scoping review was carried out to discover and compare all the possibilities the researchers have thought of in the recent past to perform in silico studies on bone healing after implantation of dental implants.

methodsAn electronic search was conducted in Pubmed, Web of Science, Science Direct and google scholar database to find out related articles in dental peri-implant healing simulations from the period of 2010 until 2025.

resultsIn total, 40 articles were found relevant for this review. Different theories have been applied in the literature to simulate the mechanobiology of bone healing. Success has been found in predicting bone healing via in silico studies. The finite element was used often for these studies; however, the application of artificial intelligence is increasing with time in this sector.

conclusionsIn silico platforms provide a non-invasive and fast approach to study the bone healing process. They can be used as an aid to predict peri-implant bone healing in dentistry. The rise of artificial intelligence in this sector opens a new path, where these studies can be performed with high accuracy at an astounding fast pace. These methods can be a boon to clinicians, patients as well as implant developers.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsWound HealingArtificial IntelligenceFinite Element AnalysisHumansDental ImplantsBone healingDental implantsFinite element method, artificial intelligence, biomechanicsIn-silico studyOsseointegration

Identifiers

PMID41275436
PMCPMC12669444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.