Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41275420›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Assessing differential cell composition in single-cell studies using voomCLR.

Alemu Takele Assefa, Bie Verbist, Koen Van den Berge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alemu Takele AssefaStatistics and Decision Sciences, Johnson & Johnson, Beerse 2340, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7773-0621
Bie VerbistStatistics and Decision Sciences, Johnson & Johnson, Beerse 2340, Belgium.
Koen Van den BergeStatistics and Decision Sciences, Johnson & Johnson, Beerse 2340, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1833-8478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIn single-cell studies, a common question is whether there is a change in cell composition between conditions. While ideally, one needs absolute cell counts (number of cells per volumetric unit in a sample) to address these questions, current experimentation typically obtains cell counts that only carry relative information. Therefore, one should account for the compositional nature of cell count data in the statistical analysis. While recently developed methods address compositionality using compositional transformations together with a bias correction, they do not account for the uncertainty involved in estimation of the bias term, nor do they accommodate the mean-variance structure of the counts.

resultsHere, we introduce a statistical method, voomCLR, for assessing differences in cell composition between conditions incorporating both uncertainty on the bias term as well as acknowledging the mean-variance structure of the transformed data, by leveraging developments from the differential gene expression literature. We demonstrate the performances of voomCLR, illustrate the benefit of all components, and compare the methodology to the state-of-the-art on simulated and real single-cell gene expression datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: voomCLR software is available as an open-source R package on GitHub at https://github.com/johnsonandjohnson/voomCLR.

Indexed as

Computational BiologySingle-Cell AnalysisSoftwareAlgorithmsCell CountGene Expression ProfilingHumans

Identifiers

PMID41275420
PMCPMC12812216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.