ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Assessing differential cell composition in single-cell studies using voomCLR.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiomic characterisation of the clinical efficacy of guselkumab induction therapy in ulcerative colitis.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Trial
- A comparative brain atlas in the Mexican cavefish identifies widespread changes in cellular composition and gene expression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationIn single-cell studies, a common question is whether there is a change in cell composition between conditions. While ideally, one needs absolute cell counts (number of cells per volumetric unit in a sample) to address these questions, current experimentation typically obtains cell counts that only carry relative information. Therefore, one should account for the compositional nature of cell count data in the statistical analysis. While recently developed methods address compositionality using compositional transformations together with a bias correction, they do not account for the uncertainty involved in estimation of the bias term, nor do they accommodate the mean-variance structure of the counts.
resultsHere, we introduce a statistical method, voomCLR, for assessing differences in cell composition between conditions incorporating both uncertainty on the bias term as well as acknowledging the mean-variance structure of the transformed data, by leveraging developments from the differential gene expression literature. We demonstrate the performances of voomCLR, illustrate the benefit of all components, and compare the methodology to the state-of-the-art on simulated and real single-cell gene expression datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: voomCLR software is available as an open-source R package on GitHub at https://github.com/johnsonandjohnson/voomCLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.